Amazon Launches Public Beta of Amazon MP3 — Bests Apple’s iTunes Plus by 1.7 Million Tracks

Amazon launched their MP3 store — as widely predicted — but did it in the first commercially viable fashion the market has seen since iTunes debuted years ago.Others have tried, but all have failed to gain much ground on Apple’s store, not because of onerous copy protection schemes, but because all the competitors to date have been so, so very stupid. [Read more]

Beer:30 Live! for 9/21/2007

This week, mean ol’ Uncle Curt Siffert from curtsiffert.com joins Shane and me to talk up the week of oddities. A man gets struck by lightning. In the penis. A University of Florida student is tazered on YouTube. The New York Times prints a story on how the Iranian President will not be allowed to visit Ground Zero on his up-coming trip to the UN, which he doesn’t actually want to visit. Congress overwhelmingly passes a resolution renouncing MoveOn.org as “mean”. All that and more this week on Beer:30 Live!

Beer:30 Live! Ep 47: When Lightning Strikes

Radiohead Misses the Point, Allows “Integrity” to Interfere with Distribution

I won’t buy the next Radiohead release. As a matter of fact, I haven’t thought about Radiohead in years. I remember Radiohead listening parties in college, but since the advent of the iTunes Store, they’ve fallen off the radar.Until this morning, when I had a chance to catch up on the Wired blog. Eliot Van Buskirk has a quick post about how Radiohead has shunned iTunes not because of DRM, not because of pricing, but because the online store refuses to sell their releases as album-only.

According to an EMI, Radiohead refuses to distribute via Apple — even through Apple’s DRM-free iTunes Plus store — entirely because of Apple’s policy of selling tracks individually:”iTunes insists that all its albums are sold unbundled, but 7digital doesn’t.Radiohead prefer to have their albums sold complete. The artist has a choice, and if they feel strongly then we respect that.”

This is a tough one. It’s tough not because of some overpowering ethical nerve, but an emotional one. Artists certainly should have the right to determine distribution, but to allow this archaic emotional attachment to a format to get in the way of public access to the material is foolish. This is a statement many bands tried to make when Apple launched the music store — bands that realized quickly that they hadn’t the might to change the course of history through market protest. The beautiful part about this whole argument is that Radiohead, like ColdPlay and Pink Floyd, are lousy to listen to one track at a time. Fans know this, and I have to imagine would by the whole album on iTunes, even if the option existed to purchase one track at a time.And now, Radiohead’s refusal to be in the iTunes store has further cemented them in the category of emo-also-ran, along with the Beatles’ army of attorneys, and all the others who chained themselves to the old ways just before the bull dozer mowed them down. And I’m forced to say of their next release, “who cares?”

Apple Muddying Up the Already Ridiculous Ringtone Business

Between Dan Frakes and John Gruber, we have a great summary of the current mess that is the ringtone business, particularly as it is addressed by Apple:

What it comes down to is, as Gruber so eloquently put it, that “the distinction between ringtones and songs is an artificial marketing construct.” The entire ringtone market is based on artificial restrictions—not physical ones, not technological ones, not even logical ones—put in place to create a market where one would otherwise not exist.

It’s this last point that is particularly important for our purposes. The idea of creating a market where one doesn’t exist is the foundation of entrepreneurialism. It’s how the computer and cell phone industry got started. It’s how people are wearing jeans as a result of the Westward Expansion. It’s how Las Vegas was founded in the middle of the desert.
[Read more]

Social and Mainstream News Interests are Different — says Project for Excellence in Journalism

This came in courtesy of Irina Slutsky’s Pownce feed this morning:

The Project for Excellence in Journalism compared stories on user-news sites with content from traditional news sources. A key finding: The news agenda of the user-sites — Reddit, Digg and Del.icio.us — was markedly different from that of the mainstream press. Many of the stories users selected didn’t appear anywhere among the top stories in the mainstream media coverage studied.

Shock and awe indeed. This is covered in full at journalism.org. The cognitive dissonance here stems from news organizations’ need to keep the lights on, while the populace is, in most cases, interested in being informed. The challenge: a cursory glance across any of the social sites bears little in terms of news I need to know. Let’s see… top “World & Business” headlines right now on digg.com…

OK, so I’m interested in Ron Paul and Castro. But 7 Underwater Wonders of the World? You build me an underwater city as a weekend getaway at the foot of the Mariana Trench, and we can talk.

New iPod Classic Busts Apple’s Product Introduction Scheme

For years, Apple’s made waves by wholly replacing successful products with radical revisions that truly evolve the product line. Today’s “Classic” announcement is an interesting departure. I’d fully expected the company to discontinue the current larger iPod with Video in favor of an iPhone-form factor phoneless iPod. They did introduce the phoneless iPod, the iPod “Touch”, but left a slight revision of the old school iPod in the channel.
[Read more]

Hulu.com Early Contender to Join the Ranks of Obscurity

The squabble between NBC/Universal and iTunes — the latest squabble — is particularly amusing. The network has said they’re pulling their content and — in related news — said they’re launching a new service of their own, Hulu.com. The new portal has not launched yet, but the splash page up right now looks like this:

Note, second from the bottom left: “Drive”. That’s right, NBC is using this opportunity to go out on their own, to enjoy the freedom of their new lives unshackled from the iTunes master, by working with FOX, who’s promoting a show they had so much faith in that they didn’t even air the final three episodes on broadcast television. That’s not really fair. Guilt by association isn’t the problem. No, the problem is that NBC is creating a new network, building a new brand where TV isn’t, in order to be out from under the thumb of a quality service where TV is.

[Read more]